1 May 2023 (Monday) - BTLP-TACT Exercise


 
Time for another BTLP-TACT exercise. I was presented with two cases
 
21906 – a fifty two year old woman in A&E requiring group & save for epistaxis.
She grouped as B Rh(D) Positive with antibody screen positive in cells 1 and 3.
I requested antibody panels. The IAT panel was positive in cells 1, 3, 6, 9 and 10 which corresponded with anti Fy(a) but did not rule out anti-Cw or anti- Lu(a). The enzyme panel was negative throughout which in reality did NOT rule out anti-Cw, but for the sake of the exercise did rule out anti-Cw.
Does this rule out anti-Lu(a)… one way to find out (!) I said it did not rule out anti Lu(a)
It might help if anti-Lu(a) appeared in the screening antigram
 
50961 – an eighty-two year old chap in the urology out patients department requiring group & save as a pre operative precaution.
His cell group was B, but serum group was not. As the control was not positive I assumed the Rh group result was valid. Was it?
I went with “indeterminate Rh(D) Negative”
The antibody screen was positive in cells 1 and 2. I requested antibody panels. Both the IAT and enzyme panels were positive in cells 1,2 and 3 which corresponded with anti-D but didn’t rule out anti-Cw
 
I got the green light…. SO – a negative result in enzyme in the simulator DOES NOT rule out anti-Lu(a).

No comments:

Post a Comment