4 September 2026 (Friday) - BTLP-TACT Exercise

Time for a BTLP-TACT exercise… I was presented with one case – a fifty-five year old chap in theatre needing six units of blood for gunshot wounds.
He grouped as O Rh(D) Positive with a negative antibody screen.
I selected six units of O Rh(D) Positive K Negative blood.
 
I got the thumbs-up.

2 September 2026 (Wednesday) - Fritsma Factor Update

The Fritsma Factor newsletter appeared in my in-box today. As always there was a lot to take in, but as a source of haemostasis-related CPD it can’t be bettered.


2 September 2026 (Wednesday) - NEQAS 2605BF

I got the results of NEQAS 2605 BF today
 
For 2065BF1 said
 
Thrombocytosis
Target cells
NRBC
Bizarre red cells
HJB (?)
Echinocytes
Rbc Fragments
Lymphocytosis
 
I wondered if this was heat changes, it was a case of congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia from the haematology clinic.
 
For 2065BF2 I said
 
NRBC
Target cells
Botyroid neutroohils
Lymphocytosis
Polychromasia
?? Occasional sickle cells???
 
I wondered if this was a case of heat stroke, it was a case of homozygous sickle cell disease three days after being treated for malaria. Interestingly the botroid neutrophils weren’t spotted by most people.
 
How did I do? Well, as I said to a colleague, this was a load of bollox. I spotted all of the salient features. However someone known to have haematological diseases which are being treated *aren’t* going to turn up as random chance findings.
The organization of NEQAS blood films leaves a lot to be desired…

 

1 September 2026 (Tuesday) - A.I.

The latest missive from the United Kingdom Accreditation Service arrived in my in-box today. You can read it by clicking here.
Good luck.
I actually laughed out loud when I read the bit about using artificial intelligence. I actually use that with any UKAS publications with which I come into contact. Seriously. I really do.
Last month I mentioned on here that I found one of their articles to be incomprehensible so I emailed UKAS to ask for it to be translated into words that I could understand. No one replied so I copied the lot into Microsoft Copilot and asked it to translate it into everyday English, and it did.
So that’s what I do with stuff from UKAS nowadays. I want to understand it, and here’s one way that I can…

 

31 August 2026 (Monday) - Learning Monday




The correct answer is option 3. Matched sibling donor transplantation using bone marrow. For younger patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia who have an available HLA-identical sibling donor, upfront allogeneic transplantation is the preferred first-line treatment.
The priority order of donor source for bone marrow transplantation is: (1) HLA-identical sibling, (2) HLA-matched unrelated donor, and (3) HLA-haploidentical donor if an HLA-matched unrelated donor is not rapidly available. Each of these donor marrow sources may be preferable to nontransplant IST.
Upfront transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor is preferred in eligible patients because immunosuppressive therapy is associated with a continued risk of relapse and clonal evolution to MDS or AML, whereas allogeneic transplantation offers a potentially curative treatment.

27 August 2026 (Thursday) - BTLP-TACT Exercise

I’ve got a day off… and it’s hossing down outside. I suppose I might as well do a BTLP-TACT exercise.
I was presented with one case – a thirty-year-old woman in labour needing group and save.
She grouped as A Rh(D) Positive with a weak reaction in the D. I called that indeterminate as that is what the software likes to see.
The antibody screen was positive in cell 2 so I performed antibody panels. The enzyme and IAT panels were positive in cells 2 and 6 corresponding with anti-K
I got the thumbs-up