17 January 2024 (Wednesday) - Coagulation Case Study

One of our trainees was given some questions to answer for his portfolio. The answers were circulated to all of us, and so I’ve shamelessly blagged them.
After all, why not? This is a really good example of where I’ve learned something…

A male patient in his 20s attends A&E after experiencing excessive bleeding during a routine dental procedure. The patient does not take any anticoagulants and has no past history of haemorrhages. In A&E, an FBC and clotting screen were requested. The results of the FBC were unremarkable.  
 
Q1: From which derivative curve shown above would the APTT value determined? 

APTT would be determined from the peak of the second derivative curve, where the rate of conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin is represented. 

The patient’s APTT result resembled the plot shown above. 

Q2: Which abnormal feature is present in this curve? What could this feature indicate? 

A biphasic curve (or double-peak) is shown in the plot above. These are often associated with coagulation disorders such as positive lupus anticoagulant, FVIII and FIX deficiency, and Von Willebrand Disease. 

The results from the patient’s clotting screen are: 

 

Patient’s Result 

Reference Range 

PT (s) 

13.0 

11.0-15.0 

APTT (s) 

44.0 

23.0-37.0 

Fibrinogen (g/L) 

3.68 

1.50-5.00 

 
The APTT was found to prolonged. Following this, a mixing study was performed. 

Q3: If the mixing study does not correct the prolonged APTT, what could this mean is causing the prolonged APTT? 

If the APTT does not correct in a mixing study this means that there is no factor deficiency, and the cause of the prolonged APTT is likely the result of an inhibitor in the patient’s plasma. 

Q4: Why is a lupus anticoagulant performed in cases of unexplained prolonged APTT? 

Patient’s with antiphospholipid syndrome may produce lupus anticoagulant antibody. These autoantibodies target the epitopes of phospholipids bound in cell membranes. This leads prothrombotic effects in vivo but prolonged APTT results in vitro. 

The mixing study corrected the APTT value therefore the sample was sent to be tested for intrinsic pathway factors: FVIII, FIX, FXI, and FXII. The results are shown below: 

 

Patient’s Result 

Reference Range 

FVIII (IU/dL) 

52 

50-200 

FIX (IU/dL) 

136 

60-150 

FXI (IU/dL) 

144 

70-160 

FXII (IU/dL) 

144 

50-200 

 

Q5: Do these results explain the patient’s bleeding episode? What role does FVIII have in haemostasis? 

These results show the patient’s FVIII level is borderline. FVIII is a coenzyme responsible for accelerating the generation of FXa and subsequently thrombin (which cleaves fibrinogen to fibrin). FVIII is also responsible for stabilising VWF. Reduced FVIII is associated with bleeding tendency. 

Q6: Based on these results and clinical history, is Haemophilia A or Von Willebrand Disease more likely? What tests could be performed to differentiate Haemophilia A from Von Willebrand Disease? 

This case may suggest VWD as patients with VWD often receive a diagnosis later in life than compared to Haemophilia A patients. This is due to most cases of VWD causing only mild disease. The following tests are often required to diagnose VWD:  

  • FVIII:C – a measure of the functional FVIII as FVIII activity is reduced in some VWD types. 

  • VWF Ag – the level of functional (and non-functional) VWF. VWF concentration and functionality is reduced in VWD. 

  • VWF:GPIbB – a measure of platelet glycoprotein activity, decreased activity represents the failure of VWF to bind to glycoproteins present on platelet membranes. 

 

15 January 2024 (Monday) - Fungal Infections


Here's something from the nice people at Lablogatory. Perhaps not of immediate relevance to me, but it made me think. I didn’t realise that fungal infections are so prevalent.
One lives and learns… by doing CPD

10 January 2024 (Wednesday) - IBMS Update

The IBMS sent out its monthly newsletter today. It had articles on the new president of the IBMS, a political joint statement with a commercial company pointing out all the problems the profession faces whilst offering no solutions, a plea for more portfolio verifiers (something for which I volunteered and have heard nothing)… 
The whole point of CPD is detailed here. I won’t dismiss the IBMS newsletter out of hand, but I will make the observation that more and more our professional body is catering to a smaller and smaller proportion of our profession.

Mind you as I’ve said before, the IBMS is like a dustbin; you only get out of it that which you put in. And having said that, am I wrong in thinking that putting in eighteen quid each month is quite enough?
(there’s reflection for you!)

4 January 2024 (Thursday) - Complete Failure at BTLP-TACT

 
I had decided not to bother with BTLP-TACT any more… I don’t so much mind getting it wrong as not knowing why I’ve got it wrong. As I tell the trainees, stuffing it up is how you learn. But you only learn *if* you find out where you went wrong. As a learning tool, BTLP-TACT leaves a *lot* to be desired.
But I had two goes…
 
On each occasion I was given no cases so I cannot have got it wrong… but both times it failed me for not doing that which wasn’t there to be done.





So what do I do now?

3 January 2024 (Wednesday) - Horiba Newsletter

The nice people at Horiba sent their morphology newsletter today. You can see it by clicking here.
This could be a useful resourse…

2 January 2024 (Tuesday) - Fritsma Factor Newsletter

The Fritsma Factor newsletter came out today. More and more I’m finding I’m forgetting so much about haemostasis. Back in the day we used to do so many more tests in-house. These days pretty much everything is referred out to specialist centres. Such a shame. But thre Fritsma Factor newsletter reminds me of that which I would otherwise forget…

27 December 2023 (Wednesday) - 2306 DM


The results of NEQAS 2306 DM are out.
A 60 year-old female who is known to have hepatic cirrhosis becomes acutely unwell with a new anaemia (Hb 78 g/l). Associated with her hepatic cirrhosis she has a long-standing moderate thrombocytopenia. The clinicians are concerned about bleeding. What do you report?
 
I saw burr cells, target cells, spherocytes, polychromasia, red cell fragments, acanthocytes, nucleated red cells, neutrophilia and a reduced platelet count. I felt this was a haemolytic process.
 
It was actually “spur cell anaemia”; something of which no one has ever heard. On the one hand you have to ask the benefit of giving us something so obscure for an EQA. On the other hand, here’s something for me to go and find out about.