An interesting case today – positive
antibody screen by capture. The enzyme panel was clearly negative but panels by
IAT and capture were 3+ in some cells and clearly negative in others. At first
sight it seemed they seemed inconclusive, but on closer inspection the positive
reactions were all with cells that were homozygous for M. In the negative
reactions the M was either in the heterozygous or was absent.
I’ve seen this sort of anti-M before. The word is "dosage".. but I don’t know/can’t remember why it doesn’t react at all with the heterozygous cells. I would have expected some reaction… wouldn’t I?
I’ve seen this sort of anti-M before. The word is "dosage".. but I don’t know/can’t remember why it doesn’t react at all with the heterozygous cells. I would have expected some reaction… wouldn’t I?
I asked on some of the
work-related Facebook groups. A chap with whim I went to college (all
those years ago) posted a rather informative PowerPoint presentation from
which I leaned loads. He also corrected my incorrect usage of the terms “homozygous”
and “heterozygous”. I learned something.
But
Whilst these Facebook groups can be
useful, you have to be selective in deciding to whom you will listen, and who you
will ignore. Am I being arrogant in feeling that more and more they seem to be
crawling with people who are planning to (yet again) re-sit GCSE
science, and are looking sure to fail it again.
No comments:
Post a Comment