The
regular email from “The Oncologist” came today. I can’t pretend I read the
lost, but several interesting snippets were in there:
Featured Articles
Gideon M. Blumenthal et al.
Although
the demonstration of an improvement in overall survival remains the
gold standard for drug approval, this commentary reviews how innovation
in cancer research has led to use of other endpoints in regulatory
decision-making.
Bruce A. Chabner
This editorial addresses the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s analysis and reinvention of the cancer drug approval process.
|
|
|
CME Activities
A
Prospective Observational Study on Effect of Short-term Periodic
Steroid Premedication on Bone Metabolism in Gastrointestinal Cancer
(ESPRESSO-01)
Prognostic
Nomograms Stratify Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
without Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis After Curative Resection
|
|
|
Discussions with Don S. Dizon
In
oncology, we strive for cure and short of that, we strive for
stability. In some instances, particularly with recurrent disease, cure
is rare, and the process of curative treatment can be quite extreme. But
in solid tumor oncology (for the most part), we have been driven toward
less-toxic treatments, less-complicated regimens, while continuing to
strive for better survival.
|
|
|
|
Clinical Trial Results
Lessons Learned
>
Panitumumab shows activity in terms of disease control rate and
preventing disease progression but not for tumor shrinkage in head and
neck squamous cell cancer for second‐line treatment. Epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR) copy number gain, a property of tumor cells that
theoretically could identify patients more likely to experience disease
response, was common among patients having disease control.
>
This trial, given the lower toxicity with an every‐2‐week schedule,
provides guidance for future trials, for example, in combinations of
immune therapies and anti‐EGFR‐antibodies.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment