The UKAS sent their newsletter today. You can read it by
clicking here. I did… I was thinking
of writing something witty and sarcastic but UKAS newsletters really are the way
forward… for all that I honestly wish they weren’t.
The UKAS sent their newsletter today. You can read it by
clicking here. I did… I was thinking
of writing something witty and sarcastic but UKAS newsletters really are the way
forward… for all that I honestly wish they weren’t.
The ASH sent their spotlight on chronic leukaemias today.
Perhaps all a bit too clinical for me, but all useful stuff:
|
|
|
There are precious few other biomedical scientists who write
a blog like this, and so when one of them posts about something that they
themselves have seen first-hand, I for one and going to shamelessly blag their
work.
You can read a rather good case study by clicking here. Hypogranular neutrophils were detected from scrutiny of an XN10 plot…
The IBMS sent its “Council and Fellows” newsletter
today. As always it was far more about “people”
than anything practical, which was a shame.
Whenever anything comes from the IBMS I always seem to be negative
about it… What do I actually want from the IBMS? I’m not sure, but I don’t
think I am getting it…
The Transfusion Evidence Alert email arrived in my in-box
today. Probably (definitely) too much
to take in at once, but unusually (at first
sight) this lot seems of more peripheral than direct interest. But
something for nothing is always worth having…
Top 10 new articles: March 2021 Each month, the NHS Blood and Transplant Systematic Review Initiative provides an overview of the most important new publications in transfusion medicine. All content is sourced from the Transfusion Evidence Library. COVID-19 publications are included in this alert. +++++ |
ARTICLE OF THE MONTH |
Time for
another BTLP-TACT exercise.
I logged
in and was (eventually) presented with one case – a twenty year old chap
attending the haematology clinic requiring two units of irradiated blood for the
following day.
The chap
grouped as O Rh(D) Positive, but the D reaction was weak. In reality I would
have sent this off to the transfusion centre (or whatever they are called
these days) to see if this was a weak D or a partial D. In view of that I
called the Rh group uninterpretable.
The antibody
screen was negative.
I selected
two units of O Rh(D) Negative K Negative blood
I got the green light.
The nice people at the American Society of Hematology sent their update today. As always much of it went over my head, but one bit caught my eye:
|