About a month ago I looked at the latest NEQAS
blood films. Here’s what I thought were the five most salient features:
1802 BF1
Neutrophilia
Myelocytes
NRBC
anisopoikilocytosis
target
cells
|
1802 BF2
Blast
cells
neutropenia
poikilocytosis
microcytosis
hypochromia
|
Here’s the consensus ten most salient features
:
1802 BF1
Nucleated
RBCs
Myelocytes
Neutrophilia
Band
form neutrophils/Left shift
Thrombocytopenia
Polychromatic
cells
Toxic
granulation
Promyelocytes
Howell
Jolly Bodies
|
1802 BF2
Blast
cells
Thrombocytopenia
Poikilocytes
Acanthocytes
Tear
drop poikilocytes
Nucleated
RBCs
Elliptocytes
Echinocytes/Crenated
cells
Pencil
forms
Band
form neutrophils/Left shift 10 80
|
So… how did I do? BF1 was a case of severe
liver disease with a leukaemoid reaction. Did no one else rate the importance
of the target cells?
BF2 was a case of ALL; I
spotted the blasts. But as for the rest… “poikilocytosis”
is a blanket term which includes Acanthocytes, Tear drop poikilocytes, Elliptocytes,
Echinocytes/Crenated cells and Pencil forms.
Interestingly the information
provided after the event glossed over the microcytosis and hypochromia.
Again the exercise expressed
disappointment at how few participants gave a diagnosis. Again I’d say that isn’t
my role.
And again I’d question the
value of this form of blood film competency assessment. The only information
provided is the patient’s age, gender, Hb and Wbc. But when the result are
provided, all sorts of other information is given.
At the very least we should be
given all the blood count results…
No comments:
Post a Comment