A
colleague has prepared a case study for staff to use for CPD purposes. I was
dead keen to try this out for myself….
Haemoglobin 14.9 g/dl
(11 to 15)
White
Blood Cells 14.3 10^9/l (4 to 11)
Platelets 124 10^9/l (150 to 400
Red
Blood Cells 5.06 10^12/l(3.8 to 4.8)
Haematocrit 0.449 ratio (0.36 to 0.46)
Mean
Cell Volume 88.7 fl
(80 to 100)
Mean
Cell Haemoglobin 29.4 pg
(27 to 32)
Mean
Cell Haemoglobin Con 33.2 g/dl
(32 to 36)
Neutrophils 2.6 10^9/l (2 to 7.5)
Lymphocytes 11.2 10^9/l (1.5 to 4)
Monocytes 0.4 10^9/l (0.2 to 1)
Eosinophils 0.0 10^9/l (0.02 to 0.5)
Basophils 0.0 10^9/l (0 to 0.1)
ESR 1 mm/h
(1 to 20)
Referred
to consultant haematologist:
Lymphocytosis
with mature lymphoid cells with clumped chromatin. smear cells seen. c/w
Lymphoproliferative disorder, most probably CLL.
|
Question 1: Discuss
what is meant by Lymphoproliferative Disorder?
Lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) refer to
several conditions in which lymphocytes are produced in excessive quantities.
They are sometimes equated with "immunoproliferative
disorders", because of the natural function of lymphocytes, but this
classification is arguable.
Examples include;
- follicular lymphoma
- chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- hairy cell leukemia
- lymphomas
- multiple myeloma
- Waldenstrom's_macroglobulinemia
- Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome
Question 2:
Illustrate the Immunophenotyping Markers to differentiate between the different
Lymphoproliferative disorders.
Disorder/cell type
|
Marker
|
B-cell
malignancies/Pan-B-cell antigens
|
CD19,
CD20, CD22, CD79b, Igm, Igd, Igk, Igl
|
Precursor
B-cells
|
CD1d,
CD10, CD34, CD45, CD58, TdT, NG2,
|
Chronic
lymphocytic leukaemia
|
CD5,
CD23, CD38, CD52{, ZAP70
|
Hairy
cell leukaemia
|
CD11c,
CD25, CD103
|
Follicular
lymphoma
|
CD10
|
Mantle
cell lymphoma
|
CD5
|
Diffuse
large B-cell lymphoma
|
CD5,
CD10
|
Burkitt’s
lymphoma
|
CD10,
TdT
|
|
|
T-cell
malignancies/Pan-T-cell antigens
|
CD2,
CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, ab TCR, cd TCR
|
Precursor
T cells
|
CD1a,
TdT, Myeloid markers
|
T-prolymphocytic
leukaemia
|
CD26,
CD52
|
T-large
granular lymphocyte leukaemia
|
CD16, CD56, CD57
|
Se´zary
syndrome/Mycosis fungoides
|
CD26
|
Adult
T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma
|
CD25, HLA-DR
|
|
|
Natural killer cell
antigens (and natural
killer
cell malignancies)
|
CD2, CD7, CD8, CD16, CD56, CD57
|
Question 3: Discuss
the CLL score.
The
CLL score is as described in:
http://www.bcshguidelines.com/documents/Lymphoma_disease_app_bcsh_042010.pdf
CLL immunophenotype
scoring system (Delgado, et al 2003)
|
|
Marker
|
Score points
1 0
|
Smlg
CD5
CD23
FMC7
CD22 or CD79b
|
Weak Strong
Positive Negative
Positive Negative
Negative Positive
Weak Strong
|
Score = or > 4 in 92% of
cases of CLL
|
|
If <= 3 then exclude
mantle cell lymphoma by one or both of:
(i) Immunostaining of bone marrow
trephine sections or lymph node for nuclear cyclin D1
(ii) FISH for t(11:14) using
blood, BM or lymph node.
Other lymphoproliferative
disorders such as marginal zone, follicular and lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas
can usually be distinguished by their immunophenotype. In problematic cases,
lymph node or other tissue biopsy may be appropriate if the distinction is
clinically important.
|
A
score of four or above is obtained in over 90% of cases of CLL. A lower score
should be treated with suspicion, but the diagnosis of CLL cannot be ruled out.
However
CD5 positivity is present in most (90%+) cases. If this is absent, then
alternative diagnoses should be considered.
CLL
scoring should not be confused with clinical staging:
|
Rai
|
Binet
|
Median survival
|
|
Lymphocytosis
(>15,000/mm3)
|
0
|
-
|
150 months
(12.5 years) |
|
Lymphocytosis plus nodal
involvement
|
I
|
A
|
<3
node groups |
101-108 months
(8.5-9 years) |
Lymphocytosis plus
organomegaly
|
II
|
B
|
>3
node groups |
60-71 months
(5-6 years) |
Anemia (RBCs)
|
III
Hgb <11 g/dL |
C
|
Hgb <10 g/dL
|
19-24 months
(1.5-2 years) |
Lymphocytosis plus
thrombocytopenia
(platelets) |
IV
PLT <100 |
PLT <100,000/mm3
|
|
Question
4: Discuss the prognosis of patient of being diagnosed with CLL with reference
to Lymphocyte doubling time
Lymphocyte Doubling Time is defined as the
period of time needed for lymphocytes to double in number the amount found at
diagnosis.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19871201)60:11%3C2712::AID-CNCR2820601122%3E3.0.CO;2-1/pdf quotes that it appears to predict the
progression of the disease. Specifically it (and other sources) feel that a doubling in less than a year is of
worse prognosis than that of more than a year.
However it doesn’t take long to find doubt
cast on the validity of these findings. After all, active therapy will reduce
the lymphocyte mass, and consequently prolong the lymphocyte doubling time.
No comments:
Post a Comment