- Sickle cell (or posh terms for the same)
- Don’t know
The nice people at the American Society
of Hematology sent
me this article today. A review of atypical lymphocytes.
If there’s one thing I see all the time it is atypical lymphocytes. On reflection I describe them by waving my hands in the air and using swear words. This article rather consolidates what I know and gives it some formal grounding.
|
Feature |
Reactive |
Malignant |
|
Patient’s age |
<30 |
>50 |
|
Lymphadenopathy |
Typically absent |
May be present |
|
Absolute lymphocyte count |
Usually increased |
Increased, normal, or decreased |
|
Percent lymphocytes |
Usually increased |
Increased, normal, or decreased |
|
Platelets |
Normal |
Normal or decreased |
|
Anemia |
Absent or mild |
Usually present |
|
Cell heterogeneity |
Present |
Absent |
|
Cell size |
Variable but usually large |
Small to medium to large |
|
Nucleus |
Irregular |
Round, indented, folded, irregular |
|
Nucleolus |
Absent or inconspicuous |
Absent, prominent |
|
Cytoplasm |
Abundant, radiating basophilia |
Scant to moderate |
|
Cytoplasmic projections |
Absent |
May be present * |
|
Red blood cell molding |
Present |
Usually absent |
|
Smudge cells |
Absent |
May be present ** |
The nice people at Fritsma Factor sent
their update today. Factor deficiencies, lupus, standardization of INR
results… all good stuff.
08666 – a ninety-three year-old woman awaiting surgery needing group and save.She grouped as A Rh(D) Negative with antibody screen positive in cells 1 and 3. I requested antibody panels.The IAT panel was positive in cells 1, 3, 6, 9 and 10 corresponding with anti-Fy(a) but not excluding anti-Cw or anti-Lu(a). But the enzyme screen was negative throughout so this did exclude them02480 – an eighty-two year-old chap in A&E with coffee ground vomit also needing group and save.He grouped as A Rh(D) Positive with antibody screen positive in cell 2. I requested antibody panels. The IAT and enzyme panels were positive in cells 2 and 6 corresponding with anti-K