I got hold of the results of NEQAS
2505BF today…In my notes for BF1 I wrote
Rbc
NRBCs
Howell Jolly Bodies
echinocytes
anisopoikilocytosis
Wbc
Lymphocytosis
Hypersegmented neuts
Plts
Thrombocytosis
For BF2 I said:
Rbc
NRBCs
Polychromasia
Target cells
Blister cells
Wbc
Neutrophilia
myelocytes
blast cells
Plts
thrombocytopenia
The blister cells had
me thinking of a G6PD deficiency, but what were the blast cells all about?
The expert opinion felt this was either G6PD or an unstable haemoglobin. Bearing in mind that unstable haemoglobin is into rocking horse poo territory, I’m claiming that as a result.
Howell Jolly Bodies
echinocytes
anisopoikilocytosis
Hypersegmented neuts
I spotted the salient
features (if the consensus view was correct) but I am shouting “I Told
You So!!” very loudly as the expert opinion started off by saying “There is a
problem with this case as there is a lack of clinical information” and then went
on to list no end of possible diagnoses.
I’ve always said that asking us to give
a diagnosis on the strength of incredibly limited information is very unreasonable,
and the expert opinion would seem to be agreeing with me.
Polychromasia
Target cells
Blister cells
myelocytes
blast cells
The expert opinion felt this was either G6PD or an unstable haemoglobin. Bearing in mind that unstable haemoglobin is into rocking horse poo territory, I’m claiming that as a result.

No comments:
Post a Comment