Time for another BTLP-TACT exercise… I logged in to the website and was presented with one case – a thirty-two year old woman in theatre requiring group & save.
She grouped as B Rh(D) Positive with a negative antibody screen
I got the green light.
Time for another BTLP-TACT exercise… I logged in to the website and was presented with one case – a thirty-two year old woman in theatre requiring group & save.
She grouped as B Rh(D) Positive with a negative antibody screen
I got the green light.
The nice people at “Transfusion News” sent their update today… One of the things I find most frustrating about transfusion medicine is how opinion changes so much. Back in the day whole blood was “the” thing to transfuse... Then it wasn’t… Now… who knows?
Who does know? That’s why we do CPD – to keep ourselves aware of who does know and what they know. Flippant? Maybe. But particularly in the world of transfusion medicine it is important to keep up with current thinking as opinion does change.
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Do Not Improve Ankle Osteoarthritis | |
| |
Benefits and Harms of Whole Blood versus Component Blood Transfusions Remain Unclear | |
| |
|
The nice people at the American Society of
Hematology sent another update today. I don’t post about many of their updates
here as most of them aren’t really aimed at me, but one little snippet of this
update made me think…
Much of what I do each day involves sitting at
a microscope passing judgement on what I think I see down it. I think it fair
to say I have a fair idea what I’m looking at. I think it fair to say that most
people peering down them do. However there is still an awful lot of
subjectivity involved. I can remember my first day on the microscope bench when
one inexperienced trainee MLSO (as we were back then) found something she
couldn’t identify in a blood film. What was that cell she saw? There were as
many opinions as there were people to offer them.
And that is just in peripheral blood. Bone
marrow is far more involved and examination of smears of that stuff requires serious
experience.
Over the years flow cytometry has taken some of the guesswork out of the matter, and it would seem that neural networks are possibly the way forward
|
|
The nice people at the American Society of Hematology sent their update today. This one was on MDS and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Like much of their output it isn’t really aimed at me, but I was glad to have a look at it; I picked up one or two snippets (as I usually do).
“Little and often” is the way with CPD…
Here are the highlights in MDS and myeloproliferative neoplasms:
|
|
|